General
Main/Index
Research
Research Abstract

Research Interests

Research Questions

Grosz/Stolzenau Miniessay

Selected Bibliography

Other
Gallery

Contact

Resumé

Print version

Research Interests Previous 1 - 2

The relationships of Notgeld   imagery to Weimar history (and cultural history) are manifold and complex. In one connection, imagery on Notgeld   illustrated the German perception of what were then the pressing issues. The imagery on individual pieces and sets of Notgeld   refer directly to the bitterness felt as a result of the Versailles Treaty and Wilson's 14 points, to the burden of reparations on German productivity, to the impoverishment of the middle class as a result post-war inflation, to the carving up of Germany and its occupation up to the Rhine River. In like manner, many illustrations exist of regional political situations: the plebicit in Schleswig-Holstein or the burning of the Volkshaus in Leipzig.

In another connection, Notgeld   imagery addresses larger issues of German identity by touting the common cultural roots of the German people in military leaders such as "Hermann der Cherusker", "Karl der Große", and "Friedrich II." and literary figures such as Martin Luther, Friedrich Schiller, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. In like manner and for similar reasons, Notgeld   depicts regional and mythical legends such as those of the witches in the Harz mountains, the giant Rübezahl, and the prankster Till Eulenspiegel. What Notgeld   imagery does not reflect is the closing of many German cultural institutions and the selling off of privately held national treasures due to the mounting privations imposed by the war and the post-war inflation.

This research then turns to explore a single set of Notgeld   issued in Stolzenau and printed in Berlin as a way to exemplify the different sense of reality it exhibits. Comparing the visual and literary imagery of Wilhelm Busch on the Stolzenau Notgeld   to contemporaneous images by Georg Grosz, we see two responses representing the perspectives of a Stolzenauer and a Berliner, a country Burgher and a city dweller, the comic and the tragic, the public face of a crisis and its private desperation. The Notgeld   image and Grosz's image both convey senses of the deprivation which the German people had endured since the late years of the Great War. But whereas artist/intellectual Grosz has become ideological, Busch's Everyperson has become philosophical. More importantly, this paper contends, the expressions of despair, the messages of encouragement, the scenes of middle class life, perspectives on the noble past, observations about German strengths all had a therapeutic value, a salve for the bruised German national identity of the post-war period. (See the Grosz/Stolzenau mini-essay.)

Far from being mere popular ephemera, Notgeld   lays out some significant features of the German nervous system and a mechanism of German historical developments, exhibiting these with an astounding variety of imagery and a remarkably high degree of artistic quality.

Previous 1 - 2

Charles R. Jansen
Professor of Art History M.T.S.U. Box 229
Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, TN. 37132
Murfreesboro, TN. 37132
cjansen@frank.mtsu.edu