Interactive Television vs. a Traditional Classroom Setting:
A Comparison of Student Math Achievement
Sherri Hodge-Hardin, Ph.D.
Abstract
While a dramatic expansion of distance learning through the use of interactive television (ITV) is allowing colleges and universities to offer students potentially unlimited access to educational opportunities, the question may be raised --- Is ITV an effective medium of instruction? The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in math achievement of students taught in an ITV class setting with the instructor present (host site), students receiving instruction via television at an off-campus location (remote site), and students taught in a traditional classroom setting. This study also examined student attitudes toward enrolling in future ITV courses.
The Problem
Recent technological advances, as well as changes in demographics among student populations, have made television an increasingly viable medium for the delivery of university curriculum (Jacobson, 1994). As more university courses become available via interactive television systems in the future, research focusing on instructional practices in televised classrooms will have greater utility. This study was designed to investigate the effects of using interactive television (ITV) asa means of teaching developmental algebra at East Tennessee StateUniversity (ETSU).
Purpose
This study focused on the achievement of three groups of developmental algebra students. The purpose of the study was to determine if there were differences in math achievement of students taught in an ITV class setting with the instructor present (host site), students receiving instruction via television at an off-campus location (remote site), and studentstaught in a traditional class setting. This study also compared traditional students and nontraditional students to see if there were differences in achievement based on age. Finally, this study tried to determine if students who enrolled in a developmental algebra course taught via interactive television would consider taking another ITV course in the future, and if they would consider taking another ITV math course in the future.
Significance
Any new method of instructional delivery requires assessment to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the system. Technology applied to education produces a greater need to evaluate outcomes to provide evidence that students in ITV classrooms will achieve as well as those students taught in traditional classrooms. If the system fails to achieve these goals, the method of delivery needs to be reconsidered. The use of interactive television to offer courses at remote locations holds promise for being an exciting method of reaching more students than would generally be able to attend if classes were restricted to lecture halls and classrooms on campus (Fulmer,Hazzard, Jones, & Keene, 1992). If it can be shown that the students at the distance learning sites are learning as well as those students in the traditional classrooms, then there would be empirical evidence that ITV should be considered as an adequate method of providing instruction beyond the campus.
Methods
For the purposes of this study, the sample was made up of all developmental
students at ETSU enrolled in an Introductory Algebra or an Intermediate
Algebra course taught via ITV during
the following seven consecutive semesters: Spring 1993, Summer 1993, Fall
1993, Spring 1994, Summer 1994, Fall 1994, and Spring1995. The researcher
was the instructor for all of these
classes. The sample also included developmental students at ETSU enrolled
in an Introductory Algebra course or an IntermediateAlgebra course taught
in this instructor's traditional classrooms
during these same semesters. Over the period of these seven semesters, 189
students were enrolled in the Introductory Algebra course under investigation,
and 112 students were enrolled in the Intermediate Algebra course under
investigation. Of the 189 Introductory Algebra students, 89 were traditional
age (22 and younger) and 100 were nontraditional age (23 and older). Of
the
112 Intermediate Algebra students, 42 were traditional age and 70 were nontraditional
age.
Tables 1 and 2 give the enrollments by student age and method of instructional
delivery for the Introductory and Intermediate Algebra courses.
Table 1
Introductory Algebra Enrollment by Student Age and Method of
Instructional Delivery
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 32 | 15 | 42 |
| Nontraditional Age | 43 | 26 | 31 |
| Totals | 75 | 41 | 73 |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 15 | 11 | 16 |
| Nontraditional Age | 19 | 19 | 32 |
| Totals | 34 | 30 | 48 |
Group 1 - ITV Host Site - This was an interactive television studio (housed
in room 123 Sam Wilson Hall) located on the main campus of ETSU. Students
in this setting were given instruction
in a room equipped with cameras and microphones at each desk. The instructor
was physically present with these students. Math instruction was given on
camera, with the students seeing the
problems worked by the instructor on two overhead television screens. Instruction
originated in this on-campus studio and was transmitted to another group
of students at the ETSU/UT Kingsport Center in Kingsport, Tennessee.
Group 2 - Remote Site - The students in Kingsport
were the second group in the study. They were part of this live, interactive
instruction. They could talk to the instructor via cordless telephone at
any time during the class. The students in Kingsport saw (via television)
and heard everything that was going on in the on-campus studio. However,
the students and the instructor at the on-campus site could only hear the
students in Kingsport (two-way audio but only one-way video). A faculty
assistant was always present with the students at the ITV remote site. This
person monitored the television equipment, kept class attendance records,
and proctored exams.
Group 3 - Traditional Classroom - Students in this
setting were taught algebra in a regular classroom. The teacher was present
with the students and instruction was given utilizing the chalkboard.
Students were placed in either the Introductory
Algebra or Intermediate Algebra course based on their score on the Academic
Assessment and Placement Program (AAPP) exam (TBR AAPP Student Information
Bulletin, 1994). As a second check in making sure students were placed properly,
a 10-problem proficiency test was given on the first day of each class.
This test covered the objectives that would be taught throughout the semester.
Student scores on this proficiency test could range from 0 to 100. If students
scored 70% or higher on the exam, they were "bumped up" to the
next level math course. This proficiency exam helped to ensure that students
were equitable mathematically from the beginning of the course. The proficiency
exam scores were used as a covariate in the study to control for any preexisting
differences among groups prior to the research. Students in all classes
were given four exams and a comprehensive final, each of which comprised
20% of the student's grade. Exams for each class were graded by the instructor.
Final grades were calculated for each student in all classes based on a
100-point scale. This numerical final grade was used as a dependent variable
in determining the effectiveness of these ITV courses.
Student attitude toward taking another ITV course
was another dependent variable in the study. During the final exam, students
enrolled in the ITV classes were asked to check 'yes' or 'no' to two questions:
(1) Would you take another math class taught via interactive television?
and (2) Would you take any other class taught via interactive television?
A two-way analysis of variance with one covariate
(ANCOVA)was used to determine if differences in student achievement existed
among the three instructional sites. The ANCOVA procedure was also used
to determine if differences in student achievement existed among the three
instructional sites when comparing traditional age students with nontraditional
age students. Student achievement was measured by the final course grade
and was ratio level data. The parametric ANCOVA procedure is appropriate
when attempting to find significant differences among three or more groups
using ratio level data (Hinkle, Wiersma, & Jurs, 1988). A covariate
was used to control for any preexisting differences among groups prior to
the research. The covariate was each student's proficiency test score.
Results for Introductory Algebra
Table 3 presents the results of the ANCOVA for Introductory
Algebra.
Table 3
Analysis of Covariance on Final Course Grade by Group and Age for
Introductory Algebra
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p |
| PROFTEST | 31066.82 | 1 | 31066.82 | 14848,47 | <.0005 |
| GROUP | 7.32 | 2 | 3.66 | 1.75 | .177 |
| AGE | .23 | 1 | .23 | .11 | .739 |
| GROUP by AGE | .72 | 2 | .36 | .17 | .843 |
| error | 380.79 | 182 | 2.09 | --- | --- |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 87.231 | 87.800 | 82.286 |
| Nontraditional Age | 83.714 | 83.577 | 85.548 |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 87.248 | 87.652 | 82.328 |
| Nontraditional Age | 83.705 | 83.662 | 85.491 |
Table 6
Introductory Algebra Student Responses Toward Taking Another ITV
Class
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | |
| Students Responding YES | 75 | 40 |
| Students Responding NO | 0 | 1 |
| Percentage Responding YES | 100 | 97.6 |
| Percentage Responding NO | 0 | 2.4 |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | |
| Students Responding YES | 75 | 39 |
| Students Responding NO | 0 | 2 |
| Percentage Responding YES | 100 | 95.1 |
| Percentage Responding NO | 0 | 4.9 |
Table 8
Analysis of Covariance on Final Course Grade by Group and Age for
Intermediate Algebra
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p |
| PROFTEST | 13969.38 | 1 | 13969.38 | 6071.19 | <.0005 |
| GROUP | 2.71 | 2 | 1.36 | .59 | .556 |
| AGE | .05 | 1 | .05 | .02 | .888 |
| GROUP by AGE | 7.33 | 2 | 3.67 | 1.59 | .208 |
| error | 241.60 | 105 | 2.30 | --- | --- |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 89.533 | 84.909 | 82.438 |
| Nontraditional Age | 87.474 | 92.105 | 83.562 |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | Traditional Classroom | |
| Traditional Age | 89.107 | 85.071 | 82.725 |
| Nontraditional Age | 87.809 | 92.011 | 83.419 |
Table 11
Intermediate Algebra Student Responses Toward Taking Another ITV Class
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | |
| Students Responding YES | 33 | 29 |
| Students Responding NO | 1 | 1 |
| Percentage Responding YES | 97.1 | 96.7 |
| Percentage Responding NO | 2.9 | 3.3 |
| ITV Host Site | ITV Remote Site | |
| Students Responding YES | 33 | 29 |
| Students Responding NO | 1 | 1 |
| Percentage Responding YES | 97.1 | 96.7 |
| Percentage Responding NO | 2.9 | 3.3 |
2. In Introductory Algebra, traditional age students
at thedistant learning site in Kingsport had a higher group mean on the
final course grade than did students in the traditional classroom setting.
3. In Intermediate Algebra, nontraditional age
students at the distant learning site in Kingsport had a higher group mean
on the final course grade than did students in the traditional classroom
setting.
4. Students in both Introductory Algebra and Intermediate Algebra had positive
attitudes toward future participation in interactive television courses.
5. The results of this study give empirical evidence
that ITV should be considered as an adequate method of providing developmental
algebra instruction beyond the campus.
Recommendations
To determine the applicability and validity of distance learning through
ITV, additional research is required. Questions that could be posed in future
studies include:
1. To what extent to corresponding studies of other ITV systems find similar
or disparate results?
2. How does the role of interaction between distant students and the instructor
relate to student achievement?
3. What are the cost benefits of the various distance education media as
these relate to institutional budgeting?
4. What are the skills required for effective distant teaching?
5. Are distant teaching skills different from the skills required by the
traditional on-campus instructor?
6. What institutional policies support or hinder distance teaching?
References
Fulmer, J., Hazzard, M., Jones, S., & Keene, K. (1992).
Distance learning: An innovative approach to nursing education.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 8(5), 289-294.
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1988). Applied statistics
for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jacobson, R. L. (1994, July 6). Extending the reach of
virtual' classrooms. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
pp. A19-A21, A23.
TBR AAPP student information bulletin. (1994). [brochure]. Nashville, TN:
Tennessee Collaborative for Educational Excellence.
[Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference Home Page] [Proceedings 1997]