2004-2005 Institutional Effectiveness Plan

Unit: Chemistry

Unit head: Earl Pearson

Reports to: College of Basic and Applied Sciences

Mission statement: The department has a long tradition of excellence in teaching. It has a strong commitment to research in laboratory chemistry, teaching pedagogy and learning theory. The department is also dedicated to serving the community, the region and the state. The mission of the department is to:

1. prepare students for successful careers as industrial chemists through our American Chemical Society (ACS) accredited B.S. degree or with the M.S. degree in chemistry;
2. prepare students for successful careers in elementary, secondary and college teaching with degrees at the B.S., M.S, and D.A. (Ph.D.) levels;
3. provide training and advisement for students in all health science pre-professional areas;
4. provide courses that emphasize critical thinking for service to other majors and for general education in chemistry and physical science for all majors;
5. provide students with hands-on access to state-of-the-art equipment for instruction and research in all modern areas of chemistry;
6. provide students with the necessary thinking skills, technical knowledge and work ethic for entrance into high-quality graduate programs anywhere in the country.

General Goals

1. Faculty will provide meaningful instruction and be available and willing to assist students. This goal applies to both undergraduate and graduate instruction. (undergraduate instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals: 1 7
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

2. The Department will offer and maintain its ACS accredited B.S. program and will extend the program to include emphasis areas as permitted by ACS. (undergraduate instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals: 7
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

3. Graduate Teaching Assistants will provide meaningful instruction and be available and willing to assist undergraduate students. (graduate instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals: 1 7
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

4. The Department will offer and maintain its M.S. and D.A. programs and continue conversion of the D.A. to a Ph.D. in i-Science. (graduate instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals: 7
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

5. The educational environment for the Chemistry Department will include appropriate equipment and technology for instruction and research in all its programs. (graduate instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals: 1 4
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

6. Faculty will provide research experiences for undergraduate and graduate students. (research/creative activity)
Related MTSU General Goals: 4
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

7. Faculty will provide opportunities for students to present their research locally, regionally or nationally. (research/creative activity)
Related MTSU General Goals: 4
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

8. Faculty will publish scholarly activity with undergraduate and graduate students. (research/creative activity)
Related MTSU General Goals: 4
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

9. Faculty will seek non-departmental support for scholarly activity with undergraduate students, (research/creative activity)
Related MTSU General Goals: 4 5 6
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

10. Faculty will provide professional service to the university, their profession or other public/private communities. (service)
Related MTSU General Goals: 4 6
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

11. The department will provide quality advisement for all health-related pre-professional programs. (service)
Related MTSU General Goals: 1
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

12. The department will provide quality courses that emphasize critical thinking to meet natural science general studies. (service)
Related MTSU General Goals: 1 7
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

13. Another emphasis areas under the ACS Accredited Major and/or departmental chemistry major. (Instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals:
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

14. Conversion of the D.A. Degree into a Ph.D. in Chemical (Natural Science) Education . (Instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals:
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

15. Improvement of teaching, research and service in all our degree programs. (Instruction)
Related MTSU General Goals:
Related College of Basic and Applied Sciences General Goals:

Measurable Objective(s):

Impacts

The data was collected from a database created by Dean Cheatham. Each faculty member posted accomplishments and activities in the database and Dr. Linda Wilson provides a summary and a listing of individual faculty accomplishments from the database. Data was also collected form the reports submitted from the faculty on the Delaware Cost Study Report. Faculty submitted to me the totals in each of the 42 categories covered in the Delaware Cost Study. These data covered most of what was needed for this report. However, some of the categories were not easily separated. It is obvious that the duplication requested from faculty should be eliminated. Dr. Robert Carlton and I have agreed to work with Dr. Cheatham to modify the College Database to include all data necessary for all the “end-of-year” reports and to develop report generators that will process the data automatically in the format needed for each individual report.

While the results from the Major Field Exit Exams are within a standard error of the national mean, we would prefer that the absolute number be above the 50th percentile. The score was 1.29 below the norm and 2.94 below the national average. The standard error was 2.96 and our score was less that 1 standard error below national average and about 2/3 of one standard error below the norm. Scores are considered “Average” if they are within 2 standard errors (5.92) of the national average. The next higher score, “Above Average” requires a score two standard errors above the national average. To achieve “Above Average” status, would require an average score of 149 (56th percentile). It is unlikely that the average score for departmental majors can be increased to this level. A more realistic goal might be to increase the score each year over the preceding year until the national average is exceeded.

We have instituted a system of providing informal reviews for the exam and provided cash awards for good performance on the MFT exams. This system has been in place for three years and has not made a significant improvement in the scores. Since the graduate required hours was reduced from 132 to 120, it is not possible to institute a “capstone” course and still maintain the other requirements for the chemistry major. I have proposed a revision of the cash award system. The new system increased the awards for scores above the 50th percentile and eliminated rewards for scores below the national median. It focuses on significant awards in the 50th to 60th percentile range. More students may try harder if they think the award is within reach.

Another area of concern is the performance on the ACS standardized exam in the freshman chemistry courses. This year the scores were below the national mean. The exam we are using is the 1997 version of the test. It may be somewhat outdated now. We have ordered a more recent version of the test. The scores did not improve. I intend to use an additional grade reward for performance above the 50th percentile on the ACS exam and include that in my syllabus for CHEM 1110 and CHEM 1120. We have selected a new text and a homework grading system in the hope that scores will improve.

This study has also pointed to the need for a departmental employer survey. An Employer Survey would allow questions more closely targeted to departmental majors and also provide valuable contacts with employers of our graduates. Graduate and professional schools should also be included. In addition to providing useful planning information, these contacts can be used to create an External Advisory Committee and may provide contacts for partnerships with external agencies. Since most of our majors are pre-professional majors, Mrs. Jennifer Braswell is keeping records of students that are accepted into professional schools so we can contact these professional schools concerning the adequacy of training of our students for professional schools. The MTSU Employer Survey is not appropriate to gauge employer satisfaction with chemistry graduates. There is no way to identify a particular department’s majors within the data obtained. Thus, the department will have to do its own survey or delete this goal and measurable outcome.


Specific Changes for 2005-2006
 Modify goals and objectives to eliminate duplication and overlap.
 Continue to modify MFT reward system.
 Order new version of ACS Freshman Chemistry standardized exam.
 Develop a Chemistry Department Employer Survey.
 Obtain faculty evaluations in electronic format and improve communication to faculty and GTA’s.
 Increase grant activity to include continuing maintenance of more than $1,000,000 and at least $500,000 in new activity each year.
 Use equipment budget to replace aging lab equipment in the $15,000 to $40,000 range.
 Identify one major piece of needed equipment and continue seeking external support until that item is obtained.
 Modify the goal “At least 50% of the faculty of the department will present work at local, regional or national meetings that include at least one student coauthor and, where permitted and appropriate, the students will make be the presentation,” to read “At least 70% of the faculty of the department who present work at local, regional or national meetings will include at least one student coauthor and, where permitted and appropriate, the students will make be the presentation.”

IE Plan