| This Week in Research Methods | Week of 2/13/12
|
| Syllabi |
Chapter scoring (lower numbers mean higher priority, 1 = bare minimum): 1: score = 5 2: score = 1 (terms, propositional logic) 3: score = 5 4: score = 2 (ethics) 5: score = 3 (stats, if you remember it, no need to buy this) 6: score = 3 (stats, if you remember it, no need to buy this) 7: score = 2 (threats to internal validity) 8: score = 1 (experimental design) 9: score = 1 (factorial design, outcomes of a 2X2) 10: score = 3 (within subjects) 11: score = 4 (bias) 12: score = 3 (details of non-experimental designs) 13: score = 3 (single subject designs) 14: score = 2 (surveys) 15: score = 2 (writing) 16: score = 5 [Top] |
| Course Notes |
|
| Homework | Homeworks/Quizzes:
|
| Lab Notes/Exercises |
[Top] |
| Resources | Project data and information
Remember: You need a citation for every statement of fact. If you took it from somewhere and you fail to cite it, that's plagiarism. Everything you cite needs to go into the reference list so that someone could find it. Articles and sources: Target article: Auton, H. R., Pope, J., & Seeger, G. (2003). It isn’t that strange: Paranormal belief and personality traits. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 711-720. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.7.711 Section 1: Measuring personality a. Sensation seeking: 8. Zuckerman, M., Bone, R. N., Neary, R., Mangelsdorff, D., & Brustman, B. (1972). What is the sensation seeker? Personality trait and experience correlates of the sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 308-321. doi:10.1037/h0033398 9. Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 477-482. doi:10.1037/h0040995 16. Quinn, P. D., Stappenbeck, C. A., & Fromme, K. (2011). Collegiate heavy drinking prospectively predicts change in sensation seeking and impulsivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 543-556. doi:10.1037/a0023159 17. Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2011). Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: Further evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 47, 739-746. doi:10.1037/a0023279 21. NIDA Notes (1995). Measuring sensation seeking. http://archives.drugabuse.gov/NIDA_Notes/NNVol10N4/MeasureSens.html b. NEO: 10. Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2010). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330-348. doi:10.1037/a0021717 11. T.B.D. 18. Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 472–477. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019 19. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 20. Sharpe, J. P., Martin, N. R., Roth, K. A. (2011). Optimism and the big five factors of personality: Beyond neuroticism and extroversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 946-951. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.033 Section 2: Measuring belief a. Magical ideation: 1. Kwapil, T. R., Miller, M. B., Zinser, M. C., Chapman, J., & Chapman, L. J. (1997). Magical ideation and social anhedonia as predictors of psychosis proneness: A partial replication. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 491-495. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.106.3.491 2. Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K., & Rodriguez, S. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218-231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.218 b. AEI: 3. Gallagher, C., Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (1994). The anomalous experiences inventory: Reliability and validity. The Journal of Parapsychology, 58, 402-428. Walk to the library to get it. 4. Wolfradt, U., Oubaid, V., Straube, E. R., Bischoff, N., & Mischo, J. (1999). Thinking styles, schizotypal traits and anomalous experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 821-830. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00031-8 5. T.B.D. c. Ways of measuring belief 6. Lawrence, T. R. (1995). How many factors of paranormal belief are there? A critique of the Paranormal Belief Scale. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 3-25. No doi; available in PsycInfo as html full text. 7. Tobacyk, J. J. (1995). What is the correct dimensionality of paranormal beliefs? A reply to Lawrence's critique of the Paranormal Belief Scale. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 27-46. Link 23. French, C. C., & Wilson, K. (2007). Cognitive factors underlying paranormal beliefs and experiences. In S. Della Sala (ed.). Tall tales about the mind and brain: Separating facto from fiction (pp. 3-22). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Get the pdf here. 24. Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Munley, G. (2010). Reality testing, belief in the paranormal, and urban legends. European Journal of Parapsychology, 25, 25-55. Don't think you're going to be able to get this one. 26. Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2004). Measuring superstitious belief: Why lucky charms matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1533-1541. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.009 Section 3: Belief correlated with things that are not personality 12. Philips, H. (2002). Paranormal beliefs linked to brain chemistry. New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2589-paranormal-beliefs-linked-to-brain-chemistry.html 13. Sharps, M. J., Matthews, J., & Asten, J. (2006). Cognition and belief in paranormal phenomena: Gestalt/feature-intensive processing theory and tendencies toward ADHD, depression, and dissociation. The Journal of Psychology, 140, 579-590. doi:10.3200/JRLP.140.6.579-590 14. Gray, T. (1990). Gender differences in belief in scientifically unsubstantiated phenomena. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 181-190. doi:10.1037/h0078898 25. Orenstein, A. (2002). Religion and paranormal belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 301-311. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00118 27. Wierzbicki, M. (1985) Reasoning errors and belief in the Paranormal. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 489-494. No doi; available in PsycInfo as pdf full text. Section 4: Belief and personality 15. Smith, C. L., Johnson, J. L., & Hathaway, W. (2009). Personality contributes to belief in paranormal phenomena. Individual Differences Research, 7, 85-96. No doi; available in PsycInfo as full text. 22. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Shafi, M. (2010). Psychology in outerspace: Personality, individual difference, and demographic predictors of beliefs about extraterrestrial life. European Psychologist, 15, 220-228. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000023
|
| Links | Correlation research, the media, and
the importance of thinking Here are some links to media reports on the link between psychosis and marijuana use. Note the uneven treatment of caveats about correlation research, and the presentation of alternative explanations:
What this shows is not that there is or isn't a link (you would need to look closely at the original research to determine that; there may be a link). What this shows is that when you see a study reported, you need to look for yourself and not take the report at face value. Research methods and experiments
Note: These are presented for informational purposes. I don't endorse everything here, and unbridled skepticism is as silly as unbridled acceptance. That said, dig in.
|
Back to Langston's Home Page